بررسی تاثیر شیوه‌های مدیریت مشارکتی منابع انسانی بر نوآوری بنیادین با نقش میانجی‌گری اشتراک دانش در شرکت‌های دانش بنیان استان تهران

•   آرشیو : نسخه بهار 1401
•   کد پذیرش : 1313
•   موضوع : سایر شاخه ها
• نویسنده/گان : | میناسادات موسوی، علیرضا مقدم
•   زبان : فارسی
•   نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
•   چکیده مقاله به فارسی : پژوهش حاضر به بررسی اثر شیوه‌های مدیریت مشارکتی منابع انسانی بر نوآوری بنیادین با میانجی‌گری اشتراک دانش در شرکت‌های دانش بنیان استان تهران می‌پردازد. روش تحقیق این مقاله همبستگی-توصیفی و از نظر هدف کاربردی است. ابزار جمع آوری داده‌ها، پرسش‌نامه و جامعه آماری تحقیق، کارکنان شرکت‌های حوزه فناوری اطلاعات و نرم‌افزار از نوع تولیدی 1 و2 شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان است. در مجموع 769 شرکت و نمونه آماری تحقیق شامل 261 نفر از کارکنان این مراکز است. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از مدلیابی معادلات ساختاری و نرم افزار Smartpls استفاده شد. یافته‌های تحقیق نشان می‌دهد ارزیابی عملکرد بر نوآوری بنیادی در شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان تاثیر معناداری دارد، آموزش و انتخاب بر اشتراک دانش تاثیر دارد و مابقی شیوه‌ها بر نوآوری بنیادی و اشتراک دانش اثر معناداری نداشت.
•   لیست منابع : [1] صحت سعید، صادقی فرزانه و آشنا مصطفی، 1394، بررسی نقش کارکردهای منابع انسانی در خلق و تسهیم دانش، فصلنامه مطالعات منابع انسانی،سال پنجم، شماره پانزدهم، ص 65-84
  [2] بیگدلی مجرد، بهروز و سلاقه سنجر، 1395، بررسی تاثیر آموزش بر استراتژی های منابع انسانی با تاکید بر نقش واسطه ای توسعه حرفه ای و تسهیم دانش، نشریه آموزش و توسعه منابع انسانی، دوره 3، شماره 10، ص 147- 166
  [3] Ardito, L., & Petruzzelli, A. M. 2017. Breadth of external knowledge sourcing and product innovation: The moderating role of strategic human resource practices. European Management Journal, 35(2), 261e272.
  [4] Ardito, L., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Albino, V. 2015. From technological inventions to new products: A systematic review and research agenda of the main enabling factors. European Management Review, 12(3), 113e147.
  [5] Armstrong, M and Baron. (2002). Strategic HRM: The route to improved business performance, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, London.
  [6] Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99e120.
  [7] Bhatnagar, J. (2012). Management of innovation: Role of psychological empowerment, work engagement and turnover intention in the Indian context. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(5), 928-951.
  [8] Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
  [9] Bowen, D., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM firm performance linkages: The role of the Strength of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203e221.
  [10] Brachos, D., Kostopulos, K., Sodersquist, K.E., Prastacos, G. (2007). Knowledge effectiveness, social context and innovation. J. Knowl. Manag. 11 (5), 31–44.
  [11] Burhanuddin. (2013). Participative management and its relationships with employee performance behaviour: astudy in the university sector in malang Indonesia.Oxford university
  [12] Cabrera, E.F., Cabrera, A., 2005. Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 16 (5), 720–735.
  [13] Cabrera, A., Collins, W.C., Salgado, J.F., 2006. Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 17 (2), 245–264.
  [14] Camelo-Ordaz, C., García-Cruz, J., Sousa-Ginel, E., Valle-Cabrera, R., 2011. The influence of human resource management on knowledge sharing and innovation in Spain: the mediating role of affective commitment. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 22 (7), 1442–1463.
  [15] Chang, X., Fu, K., Low, A., & Zhang,W. 2015. Non-executive employee stock options and corporate innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 115, 168e188.
  [16] Chen, C., & Huang, J. 2009. Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance? The mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 104e114.
  [17] Chen, S., Fan, Y., Zhang, G., & Zhang, Y. 2019. Collectivism-oriented human resource management on team creativity: Effects of interpersonal harmony and human resource management strength. International Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/0,9585192.2019.1640765.
  [18] Chiang, Y.-H., Shih, H.-A., & Hsu, C. C. 2014. High commitment work system, transactive memory system, and new product performance. Journal of Business Research, 67, 631e640.
  [19] Chin, W. W. 1998. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
  [20] Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 35, 128–152.
  [21] Collins, C. J. 2020. Expanding the resource based view model of strategic human resource management. International Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1711442.
  [22] Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. 2003. Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 740e751.
  [23] Damanpour, F., 1991. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Manag. J. 34 (3), 550–590.
  [24] Damanpour, F., 2010. An integration of research findings of effects of firm size and market competition on product and process innovations. Br. J. Manag. 21, 996–1010.
  [25] De Saa-Perez, P., & Díaz-Díaz, N. L. 2010. Human resource management and innovation in the Canary Islands: An ultra-peripheral region of the European Union. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(10), 1649e1666.
  [26] De Winne, S., & Sels, L. 2010. Interrelationships between human capital, HRM and innovation in Belgian start-ups aiming at an innovation strategy. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(11), 1863e1883.
  [27] Delery, E. J., & Doty, D. H. 1996. Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Test of universalistic, contingency and configurational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 802e835.
  [28] Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, XXVII(February), 39e50.
  [29] Fores, B., Camison, C., 2016. Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size? J. Bus. Res. 69 (2), 831–848.
  [30] GII. (2019). Global innovation index 2019. OMPI (Organizaci_on Mundial de la Propiedad intelectual). Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/ wipo_pub_gii_2019-intro4.pdf.
  [31] Hende, E G., Dunker F G., 2013. Sustainability-Oriented Innovation, Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility: Heidelberg, Germany; New York: Springer
  [32] Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9e30.
  [33] Henseler, J. 2017. Bridging design and behavioral research with variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 178e192.
  [34] Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. 2016. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2e20.
  [35] Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115e135.
  [36] Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. 2016. Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405e431.
  [37] Huselid, M. A. 1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635e657.
  [38] Kim, S., Lee, H., 2010. Factors affecting employee knowledge acquisition and application capabilities. Asia-Pacific J. Business Admin. 2 (2), 133–152.
  [39] Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderatos. Management Science, 52(11), 1661e1674.
  [40] Jiang, J., Wang, S., Zhao, S., 2012. Does HRM facilitate employee creativity and organizational innovation? A study of Chinese firms. Int. J. Hum. Re
  [41] Jim_enez-Jim_enez, D., Sanz-Valle, R., 2008. Could HRM support organizational innovation? Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 19 (7), 1208–1221.sour. Manag. 23(19), 4025–4047.
  [42] Jimenez-Jimenez, D., Barba-Aragon, M., 2021. Innovation and human resource management fit: An empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 26, 364-381.
  [43] Lopez-Cabrales, A., P_erez-Lu~no, A., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2009). Knowledge as a mediator between HRM practices and innovative activity. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 485e503.
  [44] Likert, R. 1967. The human organization: its management and values. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  [45] Lopez-Cabrales, A., Real, J. C., & Valle, R. (2011). Relationships between human resource management practices and organizational learning capability. The mediating role of human capital. Personnel Review, 40(3), 344e363.
  [46] Mazzei, M. J., Flynn, C. B., & Haynie, J. J., 2016. Moving beyond initial success: Promoting innovation in small businesses through high-performance work practices. Business Horizons, 59(1), 51-60.
  [47] Murphy, L., Huggins, R., & Thompson, P., 2016. Social capital and innovation: A comparative analysis of regional policies. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 6(34), 1025-1057.
  [48] Ngo, H. Y., Lau, C., & Foley, S. (2008). Strategic human resource management, firm performance, and employee relations climate in China. Human Resource Management, 47(1), 73e90.
  [49] Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H., 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
  [50] Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Nagata, A., 2000. A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm. Ind. Corp. Change 9 (1), 1–20.
  [51] Nonaka, I., Von Krogh, G., 2009. Perspective-tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organ. Sci. 20 (3), 635–652.
  [52] Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. OECD. (2005). Oslo Manual, the measurement of scientific and technological activities. Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. Paris: OECD EUROSTAT.
  [53] OECD. (2005). Oslo Manual, the measurement of scientific and technological activities. Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. Paris: OECD EUROSTAT.
  [54] Rai, A., Ghosh, P., Chauhan, R., Singh, R., 2018. Improving in-role and extra-role performances with rewards and recognition: does engagement mediate the process? Manag. Res. Rev. 41 (8), 902–919.
  [55] Rigdon, E. E. (2016). Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective. European Management Journal, 34(6), 598e605.
  [56] Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS, B€onningstedt.
  [57] Rolkova, M and Farkasova,V, 2015. The features of participative management style, 2nd GLOBAL CONFERENCE on BUSINESS, ECONOMICS, MANAGEMENT and TOURISM, Prague, Czech Republic.
  [58] Sashkin,M, & Sashkin, M. G. 2003. Leadership that matters: the critical factors for making a difference in people’s lives and organizations’ success. San Francisco, CA: Berrett Koehler Publishers, Inc.
  [59] Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  [60] Siyamtinah, H. S. (2016). Innovation capability of SMEs through entrepreneurship, marketing capability, relational capital and empowerment. Asia Pacific Management Review, 21(4), 196-203.
  [61] Sorescu, A. B., Chandy, R. K., & Prabhu, J. C. (2003). Sources and financial consequences of radical innovation: Insights from pharmaceuticals. Journal of Marketing, 67(4), 82e102.
  [62] Sun, L., Aryee, S., Law, K.S. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior and organizational performance: a relational perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 50 (3), 558–577.
  [63] Swan, J., Bresnen, M., Newell, S., Maxine, R. (2007). The object of knowledge: the role of objects in biomedical innovation. Hum. Relat. 60, 1809–1837
  [64] Thneibat, M..(2021). The effect of perceived rewards on radical innovation: the mediating role of knowledge management in Indian manufacturing firms, Heliyon 7, e07155
  [65] Takeuchi, R., Lepak, D. P., Wang, H. L., & Takeuchi, K. (2007). An empirical examination of the mechanisms mediating between high-performance work systems and the performance of Japanese organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1069-1083.
  [66] Urban, J., 2011. Jak bránit demotivaci zaměstnanců. Human Resources Management, 4, 31.
  [67] Uriga, J., 2011. Ako bude vyzerať práca o desať rokov. Trend, 12.5., 14-17.
  [68] Xie, X., Wanga, L., & Zeng, S., 2018. Inter-organizational knowledge acquisition and firms’ radical innovation: A moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Business Research, 90, 295-306.
  [69] Whitener, E. M. (2001). Do “high commitment” human resource practices affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modelling. Journal of Management, 27(5), 515e535.
  [70] Zarraga, C., Bonache, J., 2003. Assessing the team environment for knowledge sharing: an empirical analysis. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 14 (7), 1227–1245.
•   کلمات کلیدی به فارسی : مدیریت مشارکتی منابع انسانی، مدیریت منابع انسانی، نوآوری بنیادین، نوآوری
•   چکیده مقاله به انگلیسی : The present study investigates the effect of human resource participatory management practices on radical innovation mediated by knowledge sharing in knowledge-based companies in Tehran province. The research method of this article is correlation-descriptive and applied type in terms of purpose. The data collection tool is a questionnaire and the statistical population of the research is the employees of information technology and software and production types of knowledge-based companies are 1 and 2 , which have 769 companies in total. The statistical sample of the research includes 261 employees of these centers. Structural equation modeling and smart pls software were used to analyze the data. Findings show that performance appraisal has a significant effect on radical innovation in knowledge-based companies, training and selection have a significant effect on knowledge sharing and other methods have no significant effect on radical innovation and knowledge sharing.
•   کلمات کلیدی به انگلیسی : Participatory human resource management, human resource management, fundamental innovation, innovation
•  صفحات : 19-35
•   دانلود فایل ( 561.20 KB )