طراحی و تدوین استراتژیهای کلان سازمانی در شرکت مادر تخصصی تولید نیروی برق حرارتی

•   آرشیو : نسخه تابستان 1396 - جلد دوم
•   موضوع : موضوعی تعریف نشده!
• نویسنده/گان : مهران گلاب کش ، سعید جعفری نیا
•   کلید واژه : زکات، نصاب، توزیع مجدد، عدالت اجتماعی
•   Title : The comparison of Zakat Tax and Conventional Tax
•   Abstract :
  According to Muslim scholars, the main difference between the Zakat tax and the ordinary tax is how to calculate it, since the amount of tax on zakat is based on the accumulated wealth of the person paying the zakat, but in ordinary taxes the amount is based on income tax. The difference in Islamic taxes has led to higher taxes for the rich and lower taxes for the poor and to greater social justice. However, Western scholars believe that standard taxation should be imposed on capital gains and that it does not require a clear correlation with movable and immovable property or inheritance and housing taxes in some countries and broader tax bases for Taxes against zakat.
  On the other hand, the issue of tax justice, from the point of view of Muslim scholars, emphasizes that Islamic taxes such as zakat are a sacred religious practice and the possibility of modification or modification of the zakat tax bases (which impose certain types of wealth on individuals). Or there is no Nasab (minimum required taxable wealth) or taxpayers. While this feature may be purely Zakat, it seems to some that it is inflexible and adaptable and undermines the perspective of social justice. This article seeks to compare zakat and conventional taxes and highlights the advantages and limitations of each of the wealth redistribution tools.
•   مراجع :
  1. Salim, Arskal, Challenging the Secular State: The Islamization of Law in Modern Indonesia (Honolulu: University of Hawaìi Press, 2008).
  2. Heyneman, Stephen P. Islam and Social Policy. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2004. muse.jhu.edu/book/162.
  3. ،پایگاه اطلاع رسانی حوزه، زکات در قرآن https://hawzah.net/fa/Article/View/97171
  4. Benthall, J., (1999), “Financial Worship: The Quranic Injunction to Almsgiving”, The Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute, PP. 27-42.
  5. Smith, A., (1776), “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations”, Clarendon Press 1976, Oxford, p. 1152.
  6. Siddiqi, S. A., (1992), “Public Finance in Islam”, (2nd edition) Adam Publishers and Distributors, India, p. 113.
  7. Qardawi, Y., (1999), “Fiqh Az-Zakat: A Comparative Study”, Dar Al Taqwa, pp. 550-551.
  8. Jehle, G. A. (1994), “Zakat and Inequality: Some Evidence from Pakistan”, Review of Income and Wealth, Series 40, Number 2, pp. 205-216.
  9. Abdul Rahman, A., (2002), “Zakat Accounting: Creating Business Wealth”, Akauntan Nasional, pp. 11-6.
  10. Hassan, R., (2005), “Giving and Gaining: Philanthropy and Social Justice in Muslim Societies”, Paper presented at a workshop at Flinder University, Nov. 2005.
  11. Prihatna, A. A., (2005), “Muslim Philanthropy: Potential and Reality of Zakat in Indonesia: Survey Results in Ten Cities”, Kota Depok: Pirmedia, pp. 67-70.
  12. Bin Mohammed, A., (1993), “Zakat and Rural Development in Malaysia”, Berita Publishing: Kuala Lumpur, pp. 185-186.
  13. Mayer, A. E., (1986), “Islamization and Taxation in Pakistan” in “Islamic Reassertion in Pakistan”, Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, p. 68.
  14. Fallon, G. M., (1993), “The Taxation of Companies and Individuals in Yemen”, Arab Law Quarterly, pp. 37-41.
  15. Bradley, M. (2010), “The Invisible Handout, Smith, J.S. Mill and Marshall on Inequality and Progress”, University of Maryland, p. 1.
  16. Rousseau, J. J. (1762), “The Social Contract”, Wordsworth edition, 1998, p. 115.
  17. Hobbes, T. (1651), “Leviathan”, Cambridge University Press, p. 238.
  18. Murphy, L. and Nagel, T. (2002), “The Myth of Ownership, Taxes and Justice”, Oxford, p. 108.
  19. Locke, J. (1824), “Two Treaties of Government”, London, p. 220.
  20. Mill, J. S. (1848), “Principles of Political Economy”, The Great Mind Series, p. 805.
  21. Elkins, D. (2009), “Taxation and the terms of Justice”, University of Toledo Law Review”, Vol. 41, pp. 73-75.
  22. Musgrave, R. A. (1958), “The Theory of Public Finance”, New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 312
•  صفحات : 124-141
•   دانلود فایل ( 1.02 KB )