جایگاه عقل و تفکر در تعلیم و تربیت اسلامی
  •   آرشیو : نسخه بهار 1397- جلد چهارم
  •   موضوع : موضوعی تعریف نشده!
  • نویسنده/گان : سحر بختیاری
  •   کلید واژه : یادگیری معکوس، رفتارهای کلامی، انگیزش پیشرفت، یادگیری مشارکتی، یادگیری مشارکتی-معکوس.
  •   Title : Tey impact of cooperative learning on students` achievement motivation and verbal behaviors: mediating role of flipped learning
  •   Abstract :
    Abstract
    Introduction: One of the new methods offered for students' learning is flipped learning and cooperative learning.The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of coocperative-flipped learning on students` achievement motivation and verbal behaviors.
    Methods: The research method was quasi-experimental with pre-test-post-test design with control group. The statistical population of this study includes all sixth grade elementary school sons in Ghasr-Ghand who are studying in the academic year of 2018-2019. Forty of them (20 experimental group and 20 control group) were selected by available sampling method and were placed in two experimental and control groups. Research tools include the Poursaeidi Achievement Motivation Questionnaire (2014) and the researcher-made questionnaire on verbal behavior.
    Results: Data analysis was performed by covariance analysis test. Findings showed that cooperative-Flipped learning affects on students` achievement motivation (P <0.05). Furthermore cooperative-flipped learning affects on students` verbal behaviors (P <0.05).
    Conclusions: The results showed that cooperative-flipped learning affects on students` achievement motivation and verbal behaviors. This means that adding flipped learning while implementing coocperative learning enhances students' achievement motivation and verbal behavior.
  •   مراجع :
    References
    1. Akçayır G, Akçayır M. The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education. 2018 Nov 1;126:334-45.
    2. Nikkho Korim, Leila See reverse notes on math learning levels and social interaction of fifth grade elementary students. Master Thesis, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University; 2018. persian
    3. Heydari, E; Behbhani GPA, M. Comparison of traditional and modern teaching methods, Quarterly, 3.3-8, Physics Education Development, 2016; 33(3):3-8. persian
    4. DeLozier SJ, Rhodes MG. Flipped classrooms: a review of key ideas and recommendations for practice. Educational psychology review. 2017 Mar 1;29(1):141-51.
    5. Chen Hsieh JS, Wu WC, Marek MW. Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2017 Feb 17;30(1-2):1-21.
    6. Van Vliet EA, Winnips JC, Brouwer N. Flipped-class pedagogy enhances student metacognition and collaborative-learning strategies in higher education but effect does not persist. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 2015 May 21;14(3):ar26.
    7. Sahebyar, H., Golmohammednezhad, G., Barghi, I. Study of The effectiveness of flipped learning on reflective thinking of second grade high school students in Math. , 2019; 8(4): 33-62. persian
    8. Maycock, K. W. Chalk and talk versus flipped learning: A case study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2019; 35.1: 121-126.
    9. Alimardani, Akram. Social needs and its relationship with the motivation of faculty members in Amin University of Law Enforcement Sciences. Quarterly Journal of Development, 2019; 51: 141-158. persian
    10. Eleftheria NG, Lemos MS. Motivation in Education at a Time of Global Change: Theory, Research, and Implications for Practice', Motivation in Education at a Time of Global Change (Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Volume 20).
    11. Gruber N. Is the achievement motive gender-biased? The validity of TAT/PSE in women and men. Frontiers in psychology. 2017 Feb 15;8:181.
    12. Brunstein JC, Heckhausen H. Achievement motivation. InMotivation and action 2018 (pp. 221-304). Springer, Cham.
    13. Lee BR, Chung JH. The test of hierarchical model and validity of the Korean version of sport motivation scale (sms-k). Korean Journal of Sport Psychology. 2017;26(3):p29-40.
    14. Wentzel KR, Muenks K. Peer influence on students’ motivation, academic achievement, and social behavior. Handbook of social influences in school contexts: Social-emotional, motivation, and cognitive outcomes. 2016 Jan 13:13-30.
    15. Zhang ZJ, Zhang CL, Zhang XG, Liu XM, Zhang H, Wang J, Liu S. Relationship between self-efficacy beliefs and achievement motivation in student nurses. Chinese Nursing Research. 2015 Jun 1;2(2-3):67-70.
    16. Anokye EN, Asumeng M. Psychological capital and achievement motivation as predictors of work engagement: a study of micro and small-scale entrepreneurs in Accra, Ghana. IFE PsychologIA: An International Journal. 2019 Sep 1;27(2):62-73.
    17. Olivier E, Archambault I, De Clercq M, Galand B. Student self-efficacy, classroom engagement, and academic achievement: Comparing three theoretical frameworks. Journal of youth and adolescence. 2019 Feb 15;48(2):326-40.
    18. Han J, Lu Q. A Correlation Study among Achievement Motivation, Goal-Setting and L2 Learning Strategy in EFL Context. English Language Teaching. 2018;11(2):5-14.
    19. Skinner BF. Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1957.
    20. Carnett A, Raulston TJ, Charpentier J. The Application of Skinner’s Analysis of Verbal Behavior for Teaching Communication Skills to Persons with Developmental Disabilities. Current Developmental Disorders Reports. 2019 Sep 15;6(3):131-7.
    21. Bondy A, Esch BE, Esch JW, Sundberg M. Questions on verbal behavior and its application to individuals with autism: An interview with the experts. The Behavior Analyst Today. 2010;11(3):186.
    22. Gillies RM, Ashman AF, Terwel J. The teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom: An introduction. The teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom. 2007 Nov 7:1.
    23. Daly PM. A description of the verbal behavior of students during two reading instruction methods. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior. 1987 Apr;5(1):67-76.
    24. Dehaqin V, Hejazi E. Investigating the Process of Learning and Motivation in the flipped classroom: Review Article. frooyesh. 2020; 8(11):149-158. persian
    25. Nemati, M. Investigating the Effect of Flipped Teaching-Learning Method on Persian Language Learners' Reading and Writing Skills. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 2019; 8(18): 251-66. persian
    26. Huang MY, Tu HY, Wang WY, Chen JF, Yu YT, Chou CC. Effects of cooperative learning and concept mapping intervention on critical thinking and basketball skills in elementary school. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2017 Mar 1;23:207-16.
    27. Aşıksoy G, Sorakın Y. The Effects Of Clicker-Aided Flipped Classroom Model On Learning Achievement, Physics Anxiety And Students’perceptions. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET). 2018;5(2):334-46.
    28. Alsancak Sirakaya D, Ozdemir S. The Effect of a Flipped Classroom Model on Academic Achievement, Self-Directed Learning Readiness, Motivation and Retention. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2018;6(1):76-91.
    29. Bhagat KK, Chang CN, Chang CY. The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2016 Jul 1;19(3):134-42.
    30. Navarro-Pablo M, Gallardo-Saborido EJ. Teaching to training teachers through cooperative learning. Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences. 2015 May 5;180:401-6.
    31. Ellerani P, Gentile M. The role of teachers as facilitators to develop empowering leadership and school communities supported by the method of cooperative learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013 Oct 21;93:12-7.
    32. Gillies RM, Ashman AF. Behavior and interactions of children in cooperative groups in lower and middle elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1998 Dec;90(4):746.
    33. Chin C, Brown DE. Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. 2000 Feb;37(2):109-38.
    34. Vahidi, Z., poushaneh, K. Effectiveness of flipped Classroom on Meta-cognitive Skills and Educational Motivation in Conservatory Students. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 2018; 8(31): 141-168. persian
    35. Joshaghan nejhad, F., Bagheri, M. The Effect of Flipped-Classroom on Students’ Achievement Motivation and Learning in Computer Course. Research in Curriculum Planning, 2018; 15(58): 95-107. persian
    36. Lee HS, Kim CS. Improving Learning Motivation and Academic Achievement by Flipped Learning. InProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on E-Society, E-Education and E-Technology 2018 Aug 13 (pp. 59-63).
    37. Hwang GJ, Chen MR, Sung HY, Lin MH. Effects of integrating a concept mapping‐based summarization strategy into flipped learning on students’ reading performances and perceptions in Chinese courses. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2019 Sep;50(5):2703-19.
    38. Fazlali, F., Alavi, S., Keivanpanah, S. The Effect of Flipped Professional Development On English Language Teachers’ Engagement and Attitude. Foreign Language Research Journal, 2018; 7(2): 471-496. persian
    39. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 2015; 34.1: 1-14.
    40. Yilmaz R. Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017 May 1;70:251-60.
    41. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. Joining together: Group theory and group skills, 2011
    42. Hertz-Lazarowitz R, Shachar H. Teachers’ verbal behaviour in cooperative and whole-class instruction. Cooperative learning: Theory and research. 1990:77-94.
    43. Abolhasani, Z., Safaei Movahhed, S. providing a proposed framework for the work and technology curriculum of the middel school With emphasis on flipped classroom pattern. Research in Curriculum Planning, 2019; 16(61): 1-13. persian
    44. McLean S, Attardi SM, Faden L, Goldszmidt M. Flipped classrooms and student learning: not just surface gains. Advances in physiology education. 2016 Feb 4.
    45. Schultz D, Duffield S, Rasmussen SC, Wageman J. Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance for advanced placement high school chemistry students. Journal of chemical education. 2014 Sep 9;91(9):1334-9.
    46. Love B, Hodge A, Grandgenett N, Swift AW. Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2014 Apr 3;45(3):317-24.
    47. Prashar A. Assessing the flipped classroom in operations management: A pilot study. Journal of Education for Business. 2015 Apr 3;90(3):126-38.
    48. Golzari, Z., Attaran, M. flipped learning in higher education:Narratives of a teacher. CSTP. 2016; 4(7):81-136. persian
    49. Talley, C. P., & Scherer, S. The enhanced flipped classroom: Increasing academic performance with student-recorded lectures and practice testing in a" flipped" STEM course. The Journal of Negro Education, 2013; 82.3: 339-347.‏
    50. Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory. InTheory and research on small groups 2002 (pp. 9-35). Springer, Boston, MA.
    51. Johnson RT, Johnson DW. Active learning: Cooperation in the classroom. The annual report of educational psychology in Japan. 2008 Mar 30;47:29-30.
  •  صفحات : 127-132
  •   دانلود فایل ( 498 KB )