بررسی رموز پنج ‌ضلعی در هنر گره‌چینی ایرانی- اسلامی

•   آرشیو : نسخه بهار 1397- جلد اول
•   موضوع : موضوعی تعریف نشده!
• نویسنده/گان : فاطمه شه‌کلاهی
•   کلید واژه : و قصاص، مرد در برابر زن، قصاص زن
•   Title : Diyat and retribution of women in jurisprudence
•   Abstract :
  One of the advantages of the religion of Islam is equal treatment of men and women in terms of action, punishment, reward and enjoyment of good life and divine gifts.
  «مَنْ عَلِلَا صلحا مِنْ ذَكِرِ اَوْاْنْث و وَهُوَ مُمِمنٌ فَلَنُحْینَّهُ حَيةو ط طَيّبةً وَلَنَزْزِّنَهُم أَمْرَ
  And it is obvious that for a sublime and prosperous law, which is responsible for fulfilling the all-round rights of individuals, it is essential to consider all the differences in the circumstances, conditions and attributes of those involved, including basic necessities and reflections. Because the difference in circumstances causes a difference in the rules, such as a change in the status of the worshiper (travel and attendance), which causes a change in the rules of prayer.
  The provisions of women's rights are also examined from different aspects such as: civil law, criminal law, fundamental and administrative rights, with regard to all differences in their status, traits and family, social and economic conditions.
  What we are looking at in this article is one of the issues related to women's criminal rights, namely the issue of the difference between blood money and retribution between men and women.
  Diyat and the manner of performing qisas for men and women, in addition to having Quranic documents, have a strong and deep trace in the narrations, and the tradition and manners of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and the Amir (PBUH) testify to its quality and authenticity. Although blood money and retribution were also practiced in ignorant societies, but due to the lack of consideration between justice and crime and its punishment, Islam introduced certain rules about it to be included in Islamic jurisprudence as a legal plan and part of the rules. Be considered a signature of religion. As it is clearly stated in the interpretations of this case, the late Allama Tabatabai says in verse 178 of Surah Al-Baqarah, "And you are in retribution for life or the first of the albabs" that: When the verse of retribution is revealed, and before that, They believed in retaliation for murder, but they did not believe in it, but it was a function of the strength and weakness of the tribes. Sometimes a man was killed for a man and a woman for a woman, and they practiced equality, and sometimes ten people were killed for one person. The Jews also accepted retribution for murder and retribution for members with amnesty.2 But in Christianity, murder was not considered a principle. And they considered amputation inevitable, of course, in some books, diyat has also been mentioned
•   مراجع :
  1- نحل/97
  2- المیزان ج1 ص434
  3- مائده/ 45
  4- بقره / 178.
  5- منابع اهل سنت الجصاص (الرازی) ابوبکر احمدبن علی احکام القرآن ج1 ص9138
  رجوع شود به:
  - السرخسی ابوبکر محمدبن احمد المبسوط ج26 ص131
  - الکاسانی ابوبکر بن مسعود بدایع الصنایع فی ترتیب الشرایع ج7 ص75
  - النووی محی الدین بن شرف المجموع فی شرف المهذب ج18 ص354
  - القرطبی ابوعبدالله محمدبن احمد الجامع الحکام القرآن ج2 ص246
  - عبدالکریم زیلان الخصص فی احکام المراة ج5 ص8346
  6- لازم به ذکر است که برخی از بزرگان اهل سنت همچون ابوداود در سند روایت عمروبن حزم اشکال کرده اند.
  7- اردبیلی، احمدبن محمد، زیدة البیان فی احکام القرآن، ص671672
  8- طباطبائی، السیدمحمدحسن، المیزان فی تفسیر القرآن، ج1 ص433
  9- وسایل الشیعه ج29 ابواب القصاص فی النفس باب33 ص80 ح1
•  صفحات : 137-143
•   دانلود فایل ( 642 KB )